Diary entries forInserts

1 entry
nathansnook's profile
nathansnook

Inserts

โ€œ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ๐˜ดโ€ฆ๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ. ๐˜•๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ, ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ธ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต.โ€ The kind of film where too much control is given to the writer/director where an insularity revolves around psyche versus actual narrative storytelling. Byrum pivots between different players to lash out an interesting part of film history, but really lays out personal critique and biases around the battle of the sexes. Byrum wants to tell you what sex is, how it moves. He mansplains it to you. And then it becomes derivative in its last act, falls short, shows the shortcomings of man himself, but also Byrum as director himself. Stilted in its teleplay format. Not enough love is even given to his characters, where they are talking heads of Byrumโ€™s morals than actual people. But the players themselves give it their all. Dreyfuss does the great balancing act of insane and in-tune to play out Bryanโ€™s stream of consciousness. Itโ€™s funny what you can get away with when it comes to New Hollywood. You get to go back to old Hollywood, back to the stag films, and make a nuisance out of it all. โ€œ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด, ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜น ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜บ, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ช๐˜ต.โ€

10d ago